Definitions are limiting, and for good reason. After all, when a word
comes to mean everything, the truth is that it actually means nothing.
Globalization is the latest victim. Everywhere you turn, it's globalization. Trade policy? Globalization puts Americans out of work. Ecological disaster? Globalization.
This happens for two reasons. First, it's easy. Do you have an idea, are you trying to explain something going on in the world around you? You can either blame it on the terrorists, or sound more civilized and appeal to the catch-all: globalization.
The second reason is that nobody really has any clue as to what's going on. And caught in a torrential downpour of uncertainty—sad wars without end like Darfur and the Congo, two billion people around the world living on less than two bucks a day—otherwise intelligent minds reach for the nearest, biggest, umbrella they can grab: globalization.
Here, then, is a proclamation that we either start spending the time to pry apart the jaws of that crocodile phrase and begin to explain exactly what is going on, or, even better, we come up with original ways to look at the world. Some will be insightful, some will be wrong. But propagating an ambiguous, cloudy term that means so little (another, is the oft-remarked 'international community,' because what in the world is that, other than a cheap generalization?) spits out vapid thoughts, empty ideas, if any at all, and if there's anything the world desperately lacks is just an inkling of which way is up.
Because globalization is really just a synonym for the Internet.
[Photo of protester in downtown Mexico City, 2007, taken by Ana Bast.]
Sunday nights at the United Nations Security Council aren't known for
four-hour blowout negotiating sessions. Violence in central Africa,
however,
The repressive regime in Myanmar has a lock on the country's media outlets, and when columns of monks led massive street protests last week, traditional media outlets were stifled. Photo credits from inside the South Asian nation in the New York Times, for instance, lack names, presumably to protect the identity of any staff inside. Few, if any, Western journalists are reporting from Yangon.

